學(xue)界對(dui)行(xing)(xing)(xing)政強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)拆(chai)除行(xing)(xing)(xing)為性質的爭論焦點主(zhu)要集中在強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)拆(chai)除是(shi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)政強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)措(cuo)施(shi)(shi)還是(shi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)政強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)執(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)。有(you)的學(xue)者認為，行(xing)(xing)(xing)政執(zhi)法機關實施(shi)(shi)強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)拆(chai)除的法律(lv)(lv)后果是(shi)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)止(zhi)違法者繼(ji)續施(shi)(shi)工，防止(zhi)違法行(xing)(xing)(xing)為繼(ji)續發(fa)展，同時行(xing)(xing)(xing)政機關的拆(chai)除行(xing)(xing)(xing)為并未(wei)侵犯(fan)相(xiang)對(dui)人已合法取得的財(cai)產權益，因(yin)而具有(you)行(xing)(xing)(xing)政強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)措(cuo)施(shi)(shi)“暫時性”的法律(lv)(lv)特征，應當屬于行(xing)(xing)(xing)政強(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)措(cuo)施(shi)(shi)。
"有的學者則對《行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)法》第(di)2條第(di)3款的行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)概念進行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)解讀，認為我(wo)國行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)和行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)措施的區分(fen)標準在于(yu)是否存在行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)決(jue)定(ding)，即(ji)行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)的內容是事先做出(chu)的行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)決(jue)定(ding)，事先無行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)決(jue)定(ding)而實施的強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)手段不屬(shu)于(yu)強(qiang)(qiang)(qiang)制(zhi)執(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)(xing)。
“除(chu)了以上兩種觀點(dian)，還有學者提出強(qiang)制拆除(chu)法律(lv)屬性二元論，認為強(qiang)制拆除(chu)歸屬于行(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)制措施(shi)或行(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)制執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)行(xing)，應(ying)當(dang)根(gen)據具體適用對象，考量違法行(xing)為是否正(zheng)在進行(xing)、相對人是否明確、情(qing)況(kuang)(kuang)是否緊急(ji)等(deng)情(qing)況(kuang)(kuang)進行(xing)判斷。"這(zhe)種觀點(dian)主要著(zhu)眼F規模較小又正(zheng)在建(jian)設的(de)違法建(jian)筑的(de)治理問題，在執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)法實務中(zhong)行(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)機關對該(gai)類違法建(jian)筑 . 般采取當(dang)場(chang)直接拆除(chu)的(de)方(fang)式(shi)，這(zhe)種情(qing)況(kuang)(kuang)下強(qiang)制拆除(chu)歸屬于行(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)強(qiang)制措施(shi)似乎更符合執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)法實際，也(ye)有利于提高(gao)行(xing)政(zheng)(zheng)執(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)法效率。
